The Mother's Message to Matrupuri from MATRUPURI: RISIDA
Our worth lies only in the measure of our
effort to exceed ourselves, and to exceed ourselves is to attain the Divine. -The
Mother (1973)
Comment on Introduction to The Seven Quartets of Becoming by
debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji
One must not forget that both Sri Aurobindo an the
Mother were very aware of the social context of yoga. Sri Aurobindo can be
considered a social philosopher with the development of conditions propitious
to the emergence of consciousness being at the base of his social thought. The
same can be said for the Mother in the practical formulation of Auroville.
However, as part of the modernist discourse within which they articulated their
ideas, the social, cultural and psychological were separated, so that yoga
became articulated outside of its social/cultural conditions purely in terms of
psychology.
A postmodern discourse has problematized this
exclusive differentiation, since particularly in our times when modernity has
entered its global chapter, to think psychology in isolation from social and
cultural realities is to blind oneself from social/cultural/historical
inscription of discourses on human subjectivity and even anatomy (after all the
body is a structure of consciousness). We live in a world saturated with
economic and political power. In such a world, we may seek to find a “purity”
of collective existence by taking shelter in ashrams or Aurovilles where we
seem to be absolved of the need for thinking of these things because someone
else has provided the sheltered social conditions. Or we may act as if such
conditions are irrelevant to yoga by wishing them away in favor of a purity of
psychological concern. However, in the present rapidly uniformalizing phase of
neo-liberal globalization, the Hegelian end-of-history, there is no “inside”
whether social or psychological which is immune from the determination of this
fundamentally political regime. I am convinced that both Sri Aurobindo and the
Mother were very conscious of this and that their personal yoga through their
acts of personal consciousness, was also a micropolitics. The scope of this
micropolitics, in their case, was in fact hardly micro and is better seen as a
macropolitics. Nevertheless, what I am saying is that there is a different way
of perceiving the yoga, which does not isolate it from its dynamic entanglement
with the forces of world politics and thus enables its action not only as a
psychological “progress of consciousness” but as a being-in-the-world in the
micropolitical sense. This is one way to understand the statement of Sri Aurobindo,
“All Life is Yoga.”
One sees a good example of this active today in the
increasingly overt politicization of the ashram. I see this as the inability to
see yoga simultaneously as social/cultural/psychological. The continuing denial
of their intimate braiding has lead on the one hand to a rupture of the yoga in
its alignment with extreme right wing politics and on the other to the willed
refusal of the ostrich.
Comment on Introduction to The Seven Quartets of Becoming by
debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji … “an
eternal perfection is moulding us in its image.”
What is the yoga of self-perfection but an ethics
(will-to-right) and aesthetics (will-to-beauty) of self-fashioning? As one
aspect of the Record, Sri Aurobindo was literally engaged in aesthetic
self-fashioning since a siddhi of the sharira chatusthaya (quartet of the body)
is saundarya (beauty). He understood this term in many ways, including the
shaping of his body parts into the image of the perfection of an archetype.
In the Foucauldian sense, an aesthetics of the self
through disciplines of truth telling is a goal which can be thought of as an
alignment with the Nietzschean project of overmanhood. Reading Nietzsche
closely, one finds his overman as that being which exceeds environmental
determinations through the power of creativity. This requires first a
consciousness of the forces within and without which subject us. Freedom from
subjection is the condition for the exercise of psychic and spiritual forces of
self-perfection. The disciplines of truth telling help us to disentangle
ourselves from the compromised life to which we have acceded through our
weaknesses. It thereby strengthens that which is autonomous in us and its
creative power, to refashion ourselves in the image of beauty (saundarya), an
aesthetics of the self.
As I said earlier, there are many descriptions of
the Integral Yoga which Sri Aurobindo held simultaneously, and “an aesthetics
of the self” leading to the image of Beauty, I believe, is one such description.
Comment on Introduction to The Seven Quartets of Becoming by
debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji
SA in his language practice privileges the One over
the Many, leading to misunderstandings, imo. Because a close reading makes it
clear that the Integral is radically One and radically Infinite. This cannot be
logically comprehended and any attempt to language it leads to difficulties.
Deleuze’s Univocity, for example, which he characterizes by the formula Monism
= Pluralism, can be misunderstood, as a kind of unity as Badiou has done, or
even translated in Vedantic terms to a visistadvaita (qualified non-dualism) of
the Ramanuja school, where one cannot know the One-in-itself, but the
One-as-difference. According to SA’s integrality, this is one poise of the
supermind, the other two being those of the One-in-itself and the
Different-Ones. One may call these Radical Monism, Monism = Pluralism and
radical Pluralism. To mind, there will always be the game of musical chairs
between these three contenders without any conclusion. But it is important to
empower each of these if one is to think the unthought within thought or aspire
for that which is logically unthinkable.
Management of Human Energies - Fourth Dimension Inc. - Towards ...
A Monthly Ejournal by Sri Aurobindo Society, Pondichery. SAFIM. Sri Aurobindo Foundation for Integral Management - Management of Human Energies by M.S. Srinivasan
A Monthly Ejournal by Sri Aurobindo Society, Pondichery. SAFIM. Sri Aurobindo Foundation for Integral Management - Management of Human Energies by M.S. Srinivasan
Similarly a just, equitable, transparent and open
social and political structure with minimum of hierarchy and a maximum of free
and direct interaction between people, driven by a feeling of equality,
comradeship and fraternity, releases a vast amount of energy in the work-life.